dig +norecurse behaviour changed with 9.16.33

[Ondřej Surý]

You need to be more specific with real examples.

Ondrej 
--
Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him)

My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours.

> On 26. 10. 2022, at 17:41, Veronique Lefebure <Veronique.Lefebure at cern.ch> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> dig answer is different between BIND 9.11 and BIND 9.16(.33) when +norecurse option is used.
> Is this documented somewhere ?
> 
> Is there an option that needs to be set so that the behaviour of 9.16 is the same as the one in 9.11.
> 
> The change is that with 9.16, if the requested name is a CNAME, only the CNAME value is returned by dig, while with 9.11 dig would return both the CNAME value and the IP of the CNAME.
> 
> Thanks,
> Veronique
> -- 
> Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list
> 
> ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
> 
> 
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users