dig +norecurse behaviour changed with 9.16.33
Veronique Lefebure
veronique.lefebure at cern.ch
Wed Oct 26 15:41:14 UTC 2022
Hi,
dig answer is different between BIND 9.11 and BIND 9.16(.33) when +norecurse option is used.
Is this documented somewhere ?
Is there an option that needs to be set so that the behaviour of 9.16 is the same as the one in 9.11.
The change is that with 9.16, if the requested name is a CNAME, only the CNAME value is returned by dig, while with 9.11 dig would return both the CNAME value and the IP of the CNAME.
Thanks,
Veronique
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20221026/5004e329/attachment.htm>
More information about the bind-users
mailing list