dig +norecurse behaviour changed with 9.16.33

[Andrew Latham]

I am unable to reproduce this. Please share some examples like this:


dig +norecurse @216.239.34.110 www.lathama.org

```
; <<>> DiG 9.11.5-P4-5.1+deb10u8-Debian <<>> +norecurse @216.239.34.110
www.lathama.org
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 28525
;; flags: qr aa; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;www.lathama.org.               IN      A

;; ANSWER SECTION:
www.lathama.org.        3600    IN      CNAME   lathama.net.

;; Query time: 58 msec
;; SERVER: 216.239.34.110#53(216.239.34.110)
;; WHEN: Wed Oct 26 18:02:45 UTC 2022
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 69
```

```
dig +norecurse @216.239.36.110 www.lathama.org

; <<>> DiG 9.16.33-Debian <<>> +norecurse @216.239.34.110 www.lathama.org
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 25859
;; flags: qr aa; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;www.lathama.org.               IN      A

;; ANSWER SECTION:
www.lathama.org.        3600    IN      CNAME   lathama.net.

;; Query time: 48 msec
;; SERVER: 216.239.36.110#53(216.239.36.110)
;; WHEN: Wed Oct 26 12:03:51 MDT 2022
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 69
```

On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 10:07 AM Ondřej Surý <ondrej at isc.org> wrote:

> You need to be more specific with real examples.
>
> Ondrej
> --
> Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him)
>
> My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not
> feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours.
>
> > On 26. 10. 2022, at 17:41, Veronique Lefebure <
> Veronique.Lefebure at cern.ch> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > Hi,
> >
> > dig answer is different between BIND 9.11 and BIND 9.16(.33) when
> +norecurse option is used.
> > Is this documented somewhere ?
> >
> > Is there an option that needs to be set so that the behaviour of 9.16 is
> the same as the one in 9.11.
> >
> > The change is that with 9.16, if the requested name is a CNAME, only the
> CNAME value is returned by dig, while with 9.11 dig would return both the
> CNAME value and the IP of the CNAME.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Veronique
> > --
> > Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
> from this list
> >
> > ISC funds the development of this software with paid support
> subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more
> information.
> >
> >
> > bind-users mailing list
> > bind-users at lists.isc.org
> > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
> --
> Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
> from this list
>
> ISC funds the development of this software with paid support
> subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more
> information.
>
>
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
>


-- 
- Andrew "lathama" Latham -
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20221026/d99ba149/attachment-0001.htm>