Is this OK with a slave server for 9.1.0b1?

[Kevin Darcy]

Kevin Darcy wrote:

> Those error messages imply a problem in the zone data, and should therefore
> have nothing to do with what interface was used for the transfer. I note that
> the errors are being logged for multiple addresses.
>
> Are you perchance running an old (e.g. BIND 4) master and new (e.g. BIND 8 or
> 9) slave? Older BIND versions were more permissive about things like "CNAME and
> other data". You should really review your master zone data to see if you
> actually have an illegal "CNAME and other data" problem. If a name owns a CNAME
> record, it should own no other records (with the theoretical exception of
> certain DNSSEC-related record types which probably aren't relevant in your
> case). If you have "CNAME and other data", fix it and then your zone transfers
> should work.

To answer my own question: obviously from the Subject: line, the slave is running
9.1.0b1 (duh!). But what is the master running? Probably something that still
accepts "CNAME and other data"...


- Kevin