bind vs djbdns

[Bill Manning]

% >>>>> "Bill" == Bill Manning <bmanning at ISI.EDU> writes:
% 
%     Bill> The Bind penetration numbers you cite may be a bit high.
% 
% Maybe, maybe not. In the absence of any better impartial numbers, what
% was the breakdown of the name server implementations you found on your
% last in-addr.arpa survey? Could you publish them here or point me at
% the URL?

	http://www.isi.edu/~bmanning/in-addr-audit.html
	The non-bind "slice" is known to not be bind-based
	Its the notimp catagory that is harder to specify
	since some bind code returns notimp as well as non
	bind code.  Conservative estimates for 2q2000 would
	suggest somewhere in the neighborhood of 20% may
	not be Bind or bind derived.

	"We now open the discussion on whether bindv9 can honestly
	be called Bind, since all the Berkeley code has been excised..." :)

--bill