Client tied to pool via (sub)class in one subnet, same client has host declaration in other subnet...

[Glenn Satchell]

On Thu, September 19, 2013 7:33 pm, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
>
> On 19 Sep 2013, at 10:14, Christian Marg wrote:
>
>> subnet 192.168.65.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
>>  option domain-name "a.tu-clausthal.de";
>>  option routers 192.168.65.254;
>>  option domain-name-servers ...
>>  option broadcast-address 192.168.65.255;
>>
>>  host a.a.tu-clausthal.de {
>>    hardware ethernet 5c:26:0a:06:11:2f;
>>    fixed-address 192.168.65.128; }
>> }
>
> 	That "host" specification should be in global scope, not
> 	within "subnet".

Same for class and sub-class definition. The class is inheriting settings
form the subnet where it is defined.

Same thing is happenning for the host statement. It inherits from the
subnet where it is defined.

Both should be in global scope, ie defined outside the subnet.

regards,
-glenn