Client tied to pool via (sub)class in one subnet, same client has host declaration in other subnet...
Sten Carlsen
stenc at s-carlsen.dk
Thu Sep 19 09:35:13 UTC 2013
On 19/09/13 11.33, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
> On 19 Sep 2013, at 10:14, Christian Marg wrote:
>
>> subnet 192.168.65.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
>> option domain-name "a.tu-clausthal.de";
>> option routers 192.168.65.254;
>> option domain-name-servers ...
>> option broadcast-address 192.168.65.255;
>>
>> host a.a.tu-clausthal.de {
>> hardware ethernet 5c:26:0a:06:11:2f;
>> fixed-address 192.168.65.128; }
>> }
> That "host" specification should be in global scope, not
> within "subnet".
The router comes from the other subnet, so the class seems to have the
same properties of inheritance.
>
> /Niall
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcp-users mailing list
> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
--
Best regards
Sten Carlsen
No improvements come from shouting:
"MALE BOVINE MANURE!!!"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/attachments/20130919/1506cfe6/attachment.html>
More information about the dhcp-users
mailing list