Question about authoritative server and AA Authoritative Answer

[Mark Andrews]

> On 16 Jan 2024, at 02:32, pub.diemer29 at laposte.net wrote:
> 
> ‌
> 
> Dear Mark,
> 
> I am sorry but I don'y understand you reply.
> 
> 
> RFC 1034, § 6.2.2 the AA bit is set.
> I have a non-recursive authoritative server and the AA bit is not set. My example is similar to RFC 1034. Why, on the RFC the AA bit is set but not on my example ?

Because you were not querying the authoritative server, you where querying the recursive server in the screen shots.  When you queried the authoritative server (see dns-authoritative-question.md) you got AA in the response.

The answers from the recursive server:

;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 1

vs the answers from the authoritative server:

;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 1

> On my screenshots, where do you see negative answers ?

The ones where the answer count was zero (look for "ANSWER: 0,”).

>     De : "Mark Andrews"
> A : pub.diemer29 at laposte.net,"bind users"
> Envoyé: dimanche 14 Janvier 2024 23:54
> Objet : Re: Question about authoritative server and AA Authoritative Answer
>   
> 
> > On 15 Jan 2024, at 09:04, Michel Diemer via bind-users wrote:
> >
> > ‌Ders bind users,
> >
> > I have already asked a similar question which was more about DNS in general , this one is very specific about the AA bit.
> >
> > Today's question is : « "dig pc1.reseau1.lan ns" show AUTHORITY: 1 and "dig pc1.reseau1.lan" shows AUTHORITY: 0. Which setting or knowledge am I missing ? If possible, how to get AA answers for QNAME queries ? »
> 
> The difference is because you have positive and negative answers. The authority section has information about how long the negative response can be cached for. See RFC 2308.
> 
> As for AA ask the authoritative server rather than the recursive server. See RFC 1035. Also see the examples where AA is set in RFC 1034 and their descriptions.
> 
> AA Authoritative Answer - this bit is valid in responses,
> and specifies that the responding name server is an
> authority for the domain name in question section.
> 
> Note that the contents of the answer section may have
> multiple owner names because of aliases. The AA bit
> corresponds to the name which matches the query name, or
> the first owner name in the answer section.
> 
> 
> > I have set up two virtual machines on a virtual local network using Oracle VirtualBox. One machine is a DNS authoritative-only server. The zone is named "reseau1.lan" and defined only in bind9 zone files. If I really have to, I will name it "reseau1.home.arpa" according to RFC 8375. (I chose .lan inspired by RFC 6762 appendix G). The IP address of the DNS server is 172.16.0.254 and the IP address of pc1 is 172.16.0.21.
> 
> 
> > dig soa reseau1.lan : the AA bit is set, which is what I am looking for
> >
> > <5400853000000119embeddedImage.png>͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌
> >
> > dig pc1.reseau1.lan ns : the AA bit is set
> >
> > <6206303000000119embeddedImage.png>͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌
> >
> > dig pc1.reseau1.lan : the AA bit is not set. Why ? Which setting or knowledge am I missing ?
> >
> > <8504625embeddedImage.png>
> >
> > Below my "named.conf.options" file
> >
> > <13119901000000238embeddedImage.png>͏‌
> >
> >
> > ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌
> > --
> > Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list
> >
> > ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
> >
> >
> > bind-users mailing list
> > bind-users at lists.isc.org
> > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
> 
> --
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka at isc.org
>  

-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742              INTERNET: marka at isc.org