Re: I am provoked by ISC for the 10 years statement that ISC refuse to fulfill (Re: DNSSEC setup for stealth master and multi slave/recursive - Multiple DS keys?)

[marki]

It's hilarious.
Who says python3 is going to be a thing in 10y ... or 20
 🤣

On February 11, 2024 5:41:34 PM GMT+01:00, Tim Daneliuk via bind-users <bind-users at lists.isc.org> wrote:
>On 2/11/24 02:07, Ole Aamot wrote:
>> "This whole “we support everything for 10 years” is just a sales pitch, not a something that can be fulfilled." – Ondřej Surý — ISC
>> 
>
>
>I realize that there was a whole kerfuffle here that I mercifully missed and
>have absolutely no interest in.
>
>But it did "provoke" a question.  Does anyone think not restarting *anything* for 10 years
>is a good idea?
>
>I realize there were all these fanbois back in the day that wanted to prove
>*NIX could stay up longer and with greater stability than Windows.   But best practices
>would suggest that you patch and restart monthly at a minimum and more often for
>zero-days and more immediate threats.  I would include among this the OS itself
>as well as key infrastructure services.
>
>Oh, and for the record, I think ISC does a very fine job ;)
>
>-- 
>Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list
>
>ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
>
>
>bind-users mailing list
>bind-users at lists.isc.org
>https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20240211/29072b7b/attachment.htm>