Correlation between NOTIFY-Source and AXFR-Source

[Paul Stead]

On Thu, 9 Mar 2023, 20:27 Klaus Darilion via bind-users, <
bind-users at lists.isc.org> wrote:

> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: bind-users <bind-users-bounces at lists.isc.org> Im Auftrag von Mark
> > Andrews
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. März 2023 21:04
> >
> > Named just uses the notify to trigger an early refresh process. It then
> just asks
> > the primaries in configured order.There is no real point in trying the
> notifier
> > first.
>
> It depends. If one of the primaries is faster then the other in updating
> its version of the zone, named as secondary would have the update faster if
> it talks to fastest primary first. So there can be a benefit. Also if a
> primary is not reachable, for example maintenance and network issues, then
> named would not have to wait for timeouts before asking other primaries. So
> I see benefits.
>

Chiming in to say +1 to Kalus' logic and sight of benefit here.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20230309/0ca7814c/attachment.htm>