DNSSEC regulatory requirements?

[Moritz Muller]

For .nl, we give registrars discount if their domain names comply to a number of standards, including DNSSEC [1].
Afaik, also .se and .ch have similar incentives.

And in the Netherlands, also government websites have to comply to a number of standards, like DNSSEC [2].


—
Moritz

[1] https://www.sidn.nl/en/news-and-blogs/majority-of-dutch-domains-and-internet-users-have-dnssec-security
[2] https://www.forumstandaardisatie.nl/open-standaarden/verplicht



> On 5 Apr 2023, at 11:04, Klaus Malorny <Klaus.Malorny at knipp.de> wrote:
> 
> On 04.04.23 15:11, Josh Kuo wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> [...]
>> The only one I know of is the very dated US OMB memo from 2008. I see several European domains have better DNSSEC deployment rates (such as .de). Are there any regulations or friendly recommendations from some kind of governing body at work here?
>> Thank you.
>> -Josh
> 
> Hi Josh,
> 
> at least not in Germany/.de. There may be rules for governmental domain names, but not for the general public/commercial domains. Other European ccTLD registry have/had promotions for DNSSEC, so this might be the reason for higher deployment rates.
> 
> Greetings,
> Klaus
> 
> 
> --
> Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list
> 
> ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
> 
> 
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20230406/9cd8630d/attachment.sig>