DNSSEC regulatory requirements?

raf bind at raf.org
Thu Apr 6 00:11:50 UTC 2023


On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 11:04:10AM +0200, Klaus Malorny <Klaus.Malorny at knipp.de> wrote:

> On 04.04.23 15:11, Josh Kuo wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > The only one I know of is the very dated US OMB memo from 2008. I see
> > several European domains have better DNSSEC deployment rates (such as
> > .de). Are there any regulations or friendly recommendations from some
> > kind of governing body at work here?
> > 
> > Thank you.
> > 
> > -Josh
> > 
> 
> Hi Josh,
> 
> at least not in Germany/.de. There may be rules for governmental domain
> names, but not for the general public/commercial domains. Other European
> ccTLD registry have/had promotions for DNSSEC, so this might be the reason
> for higher deployment rates.
> 
> Greetings,
> Klaus

I think at least one Scandinavian country had a tax incentive
to encourage DNSSEC adoption, but no regulatory requirement.

cheers,
raf



More information about the bind-users mailing list