Dig -x +trace?

[Mike Hodson]

On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 2:24 PM Greg Choules <
gregchoules+bindusers at googlemail.com> wrote:

> Hi Mike.
> OK, let's try and do some practical things here.
>
> Firstly, please share your /etc/resolv.conf
>
nameserver 1.1.1.1
as I said in my first message to the list.


> Secondly, please have two windows on the go. In the first, run "tcpdump
> -nvi all -w <filename> port 53". In the second, run your dig tests.
> Then share your results. If you are reluctant to share *actually* what
> happens it will, unfortunately, be very difficult to impossible to diagnose
> exactly what's going on.
>
I think this would be best left for Ubuntu's bug report, considering the
new 9.18.7 source I found from ISC.org works properly, to completion, every
time.



> Does this help for starters?
>
Ubuntu not shipping broken software would help more.


>
>

>
>
> On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 at 21:08, Mike Hodson <mystica at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 1:59 PM Ondřej Surý <ondrej at isc.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> > - If you are debugging an active issue with an externally published
>>> domain, providing the full domain name allows others to query it in order
>>> to help you. Omitting, changing, or obscuring the domain can make it harder
>>> or impossible for others to help you.
>>>
>>> Anonymizing your question to the public open source list actually
>>> prevents people from helping you, and is disrespectful because you are
>>> asking for help for free but unwilling to contribute back at least with
>>> real data.
>>>
>>
>> I disagree. I believe it to be more disrespectful to demand that someone
>> who cares about privacy, give the info that removes said privacy.
>> I should have been very explicit in my question then:
>>
>> "Why does invoking dig multiple times return different results than
>> expected"
>>
>> and the answer i got of:
>>
>>  'your version is buggy, get a proper version' seems to be the right
>> answer to that.
>>
>> I'm still angry at ubuntu for pushing non-working software. I will take
>> this up with them, if after I take the time to compile your current
>> sources, I see significant improvement of my issue.
>>
>>
>>> Also please tone down on the snarkiness. I get it that you might be
>>> frustrated, but this mailing list is not a place to vent off your
>>> frustration.
>>>
>> I'm more frustrated by the answer to "stop obfuscating so we can help" ;
>> I did not initially ask the question "why is my delegation not working" i
>> asked "why is dig not working".
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> --
>> Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
>> from this list
>>
>> ISC funds the development of this software with paid support
>> subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more
>> information.
>>
>>
>> bind-users mailing list
>> bind-users at lists.isc.org
>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20221003/0c7e532c/attachment.htm>