Primary zone not fully maintained by BIND

Matthijs Mekking matthijs at isc.org
Fri May 27 13:59:35 UTC 2022


Hi,

Sorry for not replying earlier (traveling).

Yes, I would recommend key separation (that is use a different 
key-directory per view).

I am going to investigate your configuration more next week, to see if 
there is a hidden bug.

Best regards,

Matthijs


On 26-05-2022 14:33, Sandro wrote:
> On 26-05-2022 12:00, Sandro wrote:
> 
>> Thank you, Matthijs, for pointing out the bug. Do you have any 
>> suggestion for what to try first, key separation or policy separation?
> 
> Well, I went for key separation. Let's see if it sticks. Last time I 
> restarted BIND everything seemed fine in the beginning as well.
> 
> Of course, the question remains if there's still a bug hiding here 
> somewhere. I'd be happy providing more information and performing tests 
> to gather information.
> 
> What's been throwing me of balance over and over is the fact the zone 
> file on disk can be outdated for quite some time, while the answers 
> provided querying BIND with dig are already updated. But that's probably 
> me getting acquainted with BIND being in charge of the zone.
> 
> -- Sandro


More information about the bind-users mailing list