Minimum TTL?

[Reindl Harald]

Am 08.02.2018 um 17:07 schrieb Tony Finch:
> Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:
>>
>> yes, you are free to decide that named don't need to support the users wish of
>> such a feature. but the result is that the user stops to use named at all on a
>> inbound-mailserver and is done
> 
> Or you could use patched versions from FreeBSD or Debian ...
> 
> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/dns/bind912/files/extrapatch-bind-min-override-ttl?view=markup
> https://sources.debian.org/src/bind9/1:9.11.2.P1-1/debian/patches/10_min-cache-ttl.diff/

yeah, i will switch from Fedora to Debian or start to maintain named 
including patches on my own instead just use a different package out of 
the distribution repos which can do the same and let me control *my* 
server as i want out-of-the-box

won't happen :-)