Minimum TTL?

[Matus UHLAR - fantomas]

>Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:
>>
>> yes, you are free to decide that named don't need to support the users wish of
>> such a feature. but the result is that the user stops to use named at all on a
>> inbound-mailserver and is done

On 08.02.18 16:07, Tony Finch wrote:
>Or you could use patched versions from FreeBSD or Debian ...
>
>https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/dns/bind912/files/extrapatch-bind-min-override-ttl?view=markup
>https://sources.debian.org/src/bind9/1:9.11.2.P1-1/debian/patches/10_min-cache-ttl.diff/

FYI, it's there for years.

bind9 (1:9.6.0.dfsg.P1-1) experimental; urgency=low

   [Michael Milligan]

   * Add min-cache-ttl and min-ncache-ttl keywords

   [LaMont Jones]
   
   * Fix merge errors from 9.6.0.dfsg.P1-0

  -- LaMont Jones <lamont at debian.org>  Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:50:50 -0600


-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar at fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759