Which one performs good RPZ or Zones with Include statment

[Blason R]

Will the performance be same, considering the number of zones I have or
will have??

On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 12:16 AM, Grant Taylor via bind-users <
bind-users at lists.isc.org> wrote:

> On 04/18/2018 11:52 AM, Blason R wrote:
>
>> Pertaining to my other thread since I am building sinkhole server which
>> will eventually have around 0.5 million zones or may be 1 Million which one
>> would you think will perform better?
>>
>> RPZ or include statements? I have 8 Core Processor and 32 GB of RAM
>>
>
> Which holds more watter; a banana or a hammer?
>
> An RPZ is a specail type of zone and include statements are ways to create
> a zone from multiple files.
>
> You can easily have your RPZ zone file include contents from other files.
>
> I suspect you are meaning to ask, which performs better, a single RPZ
> covering LOTS of domains, or multiple discreet zones with each covering one
> domain (including sub-domains).  —  I suspect that RPZ will win in that I
> expect it will require fewer resources.  I say this because a single RPZ
> can have records that impact multiple domains in the single zone file,
> compared to needing multiple zones (and files) using the traditional
> non-RPZ method.
>
>
>
> --
> Grant. . . .
> unix || die
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to
> unsubscribe from this list
>
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20180419/80977970/attachment.html>