ISC considering a change to the BIND open source license
/dev/rob0
rob0 at gmx.co.uk
Wed Jun 15 01:07:16 UTC 2016
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 08:06:55PM +0000, Evan Hunt wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:38:14PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> > In reality, there IS no "middle ground" If you truly believe a
> > piece of software SHOULD be freely licensed, then that includes
> > the idea that commercial entities can use it as they see fit.
> On a personal level, I actually agree with you, and I find the idea
> of relicensing somewhat regrettable. It's not that I'm against the
> GPL, I think software creators should be able to share their work
> on whatever terms they like, but *personally* I like giving my
> stuff away with as few encumbrances as possible. It's
> disappointing to me to add any burden to it at all. I do like
> eating, though, and I won't be able to fix as many bugs if I have
> to stop doing that. :/
Or start eating bugs? ;)
/me stares at a lightning bug going by the window (a light meal)
--
http://rob0.nodns4.us/
Offlist GMX mail is seen only if "/dev/rob0" is in the Subject:
More information about the bind-users
mailing list