DIG Info Request

Linux Addict linuxaddict7 at gmail.com
Tue Feb 3 21:41:45 UTC 2015


Thanks all for your inputs!!

On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Robert Edmonds <edmonds at mycre.ws> wrote:

> Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 01:50:14PM -0500, Linux Addict wrote:
> > > I do dig . +trace and the results seem show .new servers. This is
> > > causing SERVFAIL for root query. Any ideas?
> > >
> > >  dig . +trace
> >
> > Contact the person who runs the resolver at 172.27.254.11 and report the
> > problem about the root hints. dig +trace uses the configured resolver to
> > only find the root nameservers, and directly does lookups afterwards.
>
> Also note that there are only two bits different between ascii 't'
> (01110100) and ascii 'w' (01110111).  Most likely the root cause is
> memory corruption somewhere, rather than any sort of intentional or
> unintentional misconfiguration.
>
> See, e.g.:
>
>     http://dinaburg.org/bitsquatting.html
>
>     https://www.verisigninc.com/assets/VRSN_Bitsquatting_TR_20120320.pdf
>
>
> http://mina.naguib.ca/blog/2012/10/22/the-little-ssh-that-sometimes-couldnt.html
>
> --
> Robert Edmonds
> _______________________________________________
> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to
> unsubscribe from this list
>
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20150203/9042dcb5/attachment.html>


More information about the bind-users mailing list