No subject


Tue Apr 2 00:56:56 UTC 2013


=5Bkeller=40mps=2Eohio-state=2Eedu=5D=3A

The 2000 machine can be instructed not to send
the DDNS A record registration by adding a key to the registry=2E  Go to=3A=


HKEY=5FLOCAL=5FMACHINE=5CSystem=5CCurrentControlSet=5CServices=5CNetlogon=5C=
Parameters

and create the Value Name=3A
RegisterDnsARecords
as Data Type REG=5FDWORD=2C with Value of 0=2E


Have fun=2C
=09Adam Augustine
=09Morinda=2C Inc=2E


-----Original Message-----
From=3A jrichard=40mda=2Eca =5Bmailto=3Ajrichard=40mda=2Eca=5D
Sent=3A Wednesday=2C February 16=2C 2000 11=3A25 AM
To=3A bind-users=40isc=2Eorg
Subject=3A Windows 2000 question =2E=2E=2E


I'm running Bind 8=2E2=2Ex and I'm getting the message=3A

   16-Feb-2000 18=3A08=3A24=2E272 security=3A notice=3A unapproved update f=
rom
                            =5B1=2E2=2E3=2E4=5D=2E4555 for domain=2Eca

which I understand is W2K doing its thing=2E  I'm a unix guy with no exposu=
re
to MS-land so I want to ask two questions=3A

   a=29 is this to be allowed=3F  i=2Ee=2E should I adjust named=2Econf to =
permit it
   b=29 if not=2C how do I tell them to adjust their machines to stop it=3F=


I'm suspicious it's not required as there are several W2K boxes on the
net but I'm only getting the message from a couple of them=2E  However=2C I=

know if I don't have a solution to present=2C I'll get the =22that's how it=

works=22 story=2E

Thanks in advance for any info=2E

-- =

+------------------------------------+-------------------------------------=
-
--+
=7C Jeff Richards - Network Engineer   =7C Phone=3A =28604=29 231-2667
=7C
=7C MacDonald Dettwiler Ltd=2E           =7C FAX=3A   =28604=29 278-3786
=7C
=7C 13800 Commerce Parkway
+----------------------------------------+
=7C Richmond=2C BC  CANADA  V6V 2J3      =7C Email=3A jrichard=40mda=2Eca
=7C
+------------------------------------+-------------------------------------=
-
--+



------------------------------

From=3A srp336=40my-deja=2Ecom
Subject=3A DNS troubleshooting and log rotation
Date=3A Thu=2C 17 Feb 2000 00=3A44=3A23 GMT

I've recently upgraded to bind 8=2E2=2E2p5 on our servers=2E One is SunOS
4 =5BSparc5=5D=2E=2E=2Esoon to be upgraded to Solaris=2C and the other is a=
 Solaris
2=2E6 machine =5BUltra5=5D=2E Recently=2C even going back before the upgrad=
e=2C
we've been noticing occasional performance problems on our network=2E For
example=2C sometimes a user will request a web page and waits several
minutes without response=2E He can cancel the request and resubmit it and
immediately get the requested page=2E I'm starting to wonder if we're not
having some sort of DNS problem=2C for example=2C certain queries taking a
rather longer time than others depending on which name server was used=2E
How can I get information on name server performance=3F What's a good
package to look=3F

Also=2E=2E=2Ecan a running name server daemon be given some sort of signal =
to
get it to rotate its logs to log=2E0=2C log=2E1=2C etc=2E and open a new cu=
rrent
log=3F Do I need to stop and restart the daemon for that=3F

Thanks=21

Steve Pfister
srp336=40optimum=2Ecom


Sent via Deja=2Ecom http=3A=2F=2Fwww=2Edeja=2Ecom=2F
Before you buy=2E


------------------------------

From=3A Mathias Koerber =3Cmathias=40staff=2Esingnet=2Ecom=2Esg=3E
Subject=3A Re=3A DNS troubleshooting and log rotation
Date=3A Thu=2C 17 Feb 2000 09=3A13=3A01 +0800

On Thu=2C 17 Feb 2000 srp336=40my-deja=2Ecom wrote=3A
=7C =

=7C Also=2E=2E=2Ecan a running name server daemon be given some sort of sig=
nal to
=7C get it to rotate its logs to log=2E0=2C log=2E1=2C etc=2E and open a ne=
w current
=7C log=3F Do I need to stop and restart the daemon for that=3F

You can set in the config file a size-limit for each logfile=2C and BIND
will automatically rotate it=2E You can also specify how many versions
it is to keep=2E

If you want to specifi a log-file rotation immediately =28eg
exactly at midnight etc=29=2C you can do this=3A
=09=23 mv log=2E3 log=2E4
=09=23 mv log=2E2 log=2E3
=09=23 mv log=2E1 log=2E2
=09=23 mv log=2E0 log=2E1
=09=23 mv log log=2E0
=09=23 ndc reload

As the logfile does not longer exist under the name=2C a reload will create=

a new logfile=2E

I did ask =28as part of our Bronze support contract=29 to provide a faciliy=
 to
=2Aonly=2A closes=2Freopenes logfiles without the added overhead of a reloa=
d to =

facilitate this a bit better=2E  Hopefully it will make it into BIND-9=2E

It gets more complicated if you GZIP =28or otherwise compress=29 the logfil=
es=2C
so they no longer conform to the naming scheme BIND expects=2E=2E=2E=2E

regards

=7C =

=7C Thanks=21
=7C =

=7C Steve Pfister
=7C srp336=40optimum=2Ecom
=7C =

=7C =

=7C Sent via Deja=2Ecom http=3A=2F=2Fwww=2Edeja=2Ecom=2F
=7C Before you buy=2E
=7C =


Mathias Koerber=09  =7C Tel=3A +65 =2F 471 9820    =7C   mathias=40staff=2E=
singnet=2Ecom=2Esg
SingNet NOC=09  =7C Fax=3A +65 =2F 475 3273    =7C            mathias=40koe=
rber=2Eorg
Q'town Tel=2E Exch=2E =7C PGP=3A Keyid=3A 768=2F25E082BD=2C finger mathias=40=
singnet=2Ecom=2Esg
2 Stirling Rd     =7C      1A 8B FC D4 93 F1 9A FC BD 98 A3 1A 0E 73 01 65
S'pore 148943     =7C Disclaimer=3A I speak only for myself
=2A Eifersucht ist eine Leidenschaft=2C die mit Eifer sucht=2C was Leiden s=
chafft =2A



------------------------------

Date=3A Thu=2C 17 Feb 2000 10=3A16=3A40 +0530
From=3A Sandeep Kansal =3Cskansal=40mantraonline=2Ecom=3E
Subject=3A Re=3A round robin=2C prioritize DNS results

If you running LDAP =2C then for searching your all the server=28LDAP one=29=
=2C there is
no need to put the entry in name server's file=2EJust put all server addres=
s in
your =2Fetc=2Fhosts file=2EIt will not send the request to the DNS server f=
or locating
IP =2E

Sandeep Kansal

Nikos Voutsinas wrote=3A

=3E Hello=2C
=3E
=3E I have nine servers spread all over my country=2E Those servers are LDA=
P
=3E servers=2C mail servers=2C=2E=2E=2E=2E=2E
=3E To ensure high availability I have to use something like round robin in=
 DNS
=3E =28most of the clients=2C e=2Eg=2E LDAP clients can be configured to se=
arch only one
=3E LDAP server=29
=3E The problem with DNS round robins is that they make no attempt to prior=
itize
=3E DNS results =28e=2Eg=2E based on network location=29
=3E Is there anyway so I can make DNS return first hosts on the local netwo=
rk=2C
=3E before trying hosts that are farther away=2E
=3E
=3E Nikos Voutsinas


-- Binary=2Funsupported file stripped by Listar --
-- Type=3A text=2Fx-vcard
-- File=3A skansal=2Evcf
-- Desc=3A Card for Sandeep Kansal



------------------------------

End of bind-users Digest V2 =2346
=2A=2A=2A=2A=2A=2A=2A=2A=2A=2A=2A=2A=2A=2A=2A=2A=2A=2A=2A=2A=2A=2A=2A=2A=2A=
=2A=2A=2A=2A=2A=2A




More information about the bind-users mailing list