No subject
Tue Apr 2 00:56:56 UTC 2013
Remotely =3A
----------
=5B250=5Dhecate =25 nslookup - 161=2E71=2E171=2E250
Default Server=3A ns=2E3Com=2Eco=2Euk
Address=3A 161=2E71=2E171=2E250
=3E set class=3Dchaos
=3E set q=3Dtxt
=3E version=2Ebind
Server=3A ns=2E3Com=2Eco=2Euk
Address=3A 161=2E71=2E171=2E250
VERSION=2EBIND text =3D =22One Ring to rule them all=2C One Ring to find=
them=2C=5C
One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind=
them=5C
In the Land of Mordor=2C where the Shadows lie=2E=22=
=3E =
or locally =3A
------------
=5B311=5Dathena =25 =2FBIND=2FJail=2Fusr=2Fsbin=2Fnamed -v
named 8=2E2=2E2-P5 Wed Jan 19 12=3A28=3A35 GMT 2000
root=40pictor=3A=2Fexport=2Fhome=2Fsource=2Fbind=2Fbind-822p5-buildir-root=2F=
bin=2Fnamed
You can set the version string as per above if you want to hide it=2C with=3A=
options =7B directory =22=2F=22=3B
version =22One Ring to rule them all=2C One Ring to find them=2C
One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them
In the Land of Mordor=2C where the Shadows lie=2E=22=3B
=7D=3B
Tony=2E
=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D=
-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D=
-=3D =
=22He who will not reason is a bigot=3B he who cannot is a fool=3B =
and he who dares not is a slave=2E=22 - Sir William Drummond
=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D=
-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D=
-=3D
------------------------------
Date=3A Wed=2C 16 Feb 2000 17=3A13=3A14 -0500
From=3A Kevin Darcy =3Ckcd=40daimlerchrysler=2Ecom=3E
Subject=3A Re=3A short ttl and servermmirroring
Barry Margolin wrote=3A
=3E In article =3C88citf=A436h=A41=40nnrp1=2Edeja=2Ecom=3E=2C =3Chilgart=40=
netscape=2Enet=3E wrote=3A
=3E =3EI have a related question=2E I'm really eager to use the BIND 8 NOT=
IFY
=3E =3EFEATURE but in my tests between to BIND 8=2E2=2E2 p 5 servers=2C it'=
s taking
=3E =3Elonger than I'd like - anywhere from 30 seconds to a few minutes=2E =
That
=3E =3Eis=2C the primary server is waiting that long before initiating a NO=
TIFY
=3E =3Eto the secondary when a domain has changed=2E The secondary picks u=
p the
=3E =3Enew zone instantly once it has been NOTIFY'd=2E
=3E =3E
=3E =3EI was hoping for a 1- or 2-second value for this feature to kick in=2E=
=3E =3EThese timings are key to enable rapid failover to back-up servers=2E=
=3E =3E
=3E =3EWhat are other people's experiences=3F What might be slowing this d=
own=3F
=3E
=3E I think this is intentional=2E It waits a random amount of time to kee=
p from
=3E flooding a slave server with NOTIFY messages all at once=2E
=3E
=3E The purpose of NOTIFY isn't to achieve instant propagation=2C just to b=
e much
=3E better than waiting for the Refresh period=2E
There's no doubt it's intentional -- RFC 1996 =28NOTIFY=29 suggests the pra=
ctice=2C
although stops short of actually recommending it=2E The author is Vixie=2C =
of
BIND fame=2E=2E=2E
- Kevin
------------------------------
From=3A Barry Margolin =3Cbarmar=40bbnplanet=2Ecom=3E
Subject=3A Re=3A Multiple domains assigned to a single IP
Date=3A Wed=2C 16 Feb 2000 22=3A17=3A25 GMT
In article =3CNDBBLAJJCLLNMCHHOPBAIEOHCBAA=2Edamiller=40epangea=2Ecom=3E=2C=
Danny =3Cdamiller=40epangea=2Ecom=3E wrote=3A
=3ESituation=3A Windows NT Server 4=2E0=2C SP4=2C Bind DNS v 4=2E9=2E5 =28I=
know I need to
=3Eupgrade but I just got here so please don't go there=2C unless you think=
this
=3Eis the problem=29=2E I have several =28137=29 virtual domains assigned =
to the same
=3EIP address =28209=2E75=2E36=2E88=29=2E
=3E
=3EThe problem=3A some of these domains can be resolved =28www=2E4anitsolut=
ion=2Ecom
=3Efor example=29 and some can't =28www=2Ebestbuyforcomputersonline=2Ecom f=
or example=29=2E
=3EAlso=2C I have one =28www=2Ecausemarketing=2Ecom=29 that could be resolv=
ed earlier
=3Etoday but now it can't=2E What the heck is going on here=3F I've reloa=
ded the
=3Edatabase=2C stopped and started the server and the service=2C checked th=
e
=3Earchive files to see if there's any history of this kind of thing and I =
come
=3Eup empty=2E Does anybody have any bright ideas=3F I'm beginning to won=
der if
=3Eit's a virus of sorts=2E Any help would be appreciated=2E
It's acting like the =22primary bestbuyforcomputersonline=2Ecom=22 line has=
been
removed from the named=2Eboot file=2E Are you sure it's still in there=3F
ISTR that either 4=2E9=2E4 or 4=2E9=2E5 had a bug where it would simply =22=
forget=22
some zones that it was primary for=2E
-- =
Barry Margolin=2C barmar=40bbnplanet=2Ecom
GTE Internetworking=2C Powered by BBN=2C Burlington=2C MA
=2A=2A=2A DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME=2C post them to new=
sgroups=2E
Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the gr=
oup=2E
------------------------------
Date=3A Wed=2C 16 Feb 2000 17=3A16=3A36 -0500
From=3A Kevin Darcy =3Ckcd=40daimlerchrysler=2Ecom=3E
Subject=3A Re=3A make depend error=3F=3F
Ray Velez wrote=3A
=3E Getting this error during the make depend call=2E Which package has
=3E math=2Eh=3F
=3E -Ray
=3E
=3E Making =2Fexport=2Fhome=2Fbind=2Fsrc=2F=2Esystype
=3E Making =2Esettings
=3E In file included from res=5Fdebug=2Ec=3A113=3A
=3E =2Fusr=2Flocal=2Flib=2Fgcc-lib=2Fsparc-sun-solaris2=2E6=2F2=2E8=2E1=2Fi=
nclude=2Fmath=2Eh=3A5=3A
=3E math=2Eh=3A No s
=3E uch file or directory
=3E In file included from named-xfer=2Ec=3A152=3A
=3E =2Fusr=2Flocal=2Flib=2Fgcc-lib=2Fsparc-sun-solaris2=2E6=2F2=2E8=2E1=2Fi=
nclude=2Fmath=2Eh=3A5=3A
=3E math=2Eh=3A No s
=3E uch file or directory
On Solaris 7=2C it's =22SUNWlibm=22=2E
- Kevin
------------------------------
From=3A Adam Augustine =3Cadam=5Faugustine=40morinda=2Ecom=3E
Subject=3A RE=3A Windows 2000 question =2E=2E=2E
Date=3A Wed=2C 16 Feb 2000 17=3A21=3A15 -0700
More information about the bind-users
mailing list