DNS Sinkhole in BIND

[Michelle Konzack]

Hello G.W. Haywood,

Am 2011-10-27 16:56:44, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 Michelle Konzack wrote:
> > ...and you get the hell on you ass if you have several 1000 of them!
> > In this case, bind9 with RPZ is cheaper.
> Maybe look at ipsets.  Currently we firewall almost 76,000 networks.
> [root at mail3 ~]# ipset -L | grep -v BLOCK | wc -l
>   75845

...by accepting, IPT consum 90% of the CPU resources.  =8<O

Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
    Michelle Konzack

-- 
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ######################
   Development of Intranet and Embedded Systems with Debian GNU/Linux
               Internet Service Provider, Cloud Computing
                <http://www.itsystems.tamay-dogan.net/>

itsystems at tdnet                     Jabber  linux4michelle at jabber.ccc.de
Owner Michelle Konzack

Gewerbe Strasse 3                   Tel office: +49-176-86004575
77694 Kehl                          Tel mobil:  +49-177-9351947
Germany                             Tel mobil:  +33-6-61925193  (France)

USt-ID:  DE 278 049 239

Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.pgp
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20111027/c6be396b/attachment.bin>