question about thehartford.com domain

M. Meadows sun-guru at live.com
Wed Jun 15 23:41:21 UTC 2011



The DNS admins at thehartford.com seem to feel that this nameserver mismatch is working as expected. Here's some of the feedback we received from them when we questioned the setup:



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~We use load balancers for
the majority of our internet facing URLs. We have multiple datacenters. We
typically have our URLs defined in multiple datacenters. Each datacenter has a
pair of redundant load balancers. Typically each URL we have is defined in each
datacenter with its own address. The active load balancer in a particular
datacenter 'owns' one of the NS servers you see when you lookup our
authoritative name servers, ie: ns1 or ns2.thehartford.com. There is
a 'floating' address shared between the active and failover load balancers
that is associated with ns1 or ns2.thehartford.com. 

 

hfdns3, hfdns4, simns3,
simns4 are the addresses for the specific bind processes running on the actual
physical devices. 

NS1.thehartford.com will
be shared between hfdns3 and hfdns4. NS2.thehartford.com between the simns3 and
simns4 name servers.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

So I'm just wondering if anyone still feels that the nameserver mismatch seen with the digs in earlier parts of this email thread may present a problem to servers requesting name resolution for address records in the "thehartford.com" domain.

Thanks,
Marty


From: sun-guru at live.com
To: michael at rancid.berkeley.edu
Subject: RE: question about thehartford.com domain
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:59:32 -0400
CC: bind-users at lists.isc.org








 

Just wanted to say thanks to everyone for the quick feedback!

We appreciate your assistance on this.

 

Marty

 


 

> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:25:00 -0700
> From: michael at rancid.berkeley.edu
> To: sun-guru at live.com
> CC: bind-users at lists.isc.org
> Subject: Re: question about thehartford.com domain
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, M. Meadows wrote:
> 
> > Question : our check of whois indicates that ns1.thehartford.com and ns2.thehartford.com are
> > the authoritative nameservers for thehartford.com. A dig with a +trace for
> > eftc.thehartford.com seems to indicate that they are indeed the auth nameservers. It?s
> > interesting, though, that an http://www.kloth.net/services/nslookup.php lookup for
> > thehartford.com query for NS records shows a non-authoritative answer of
> > hfdns3.thehartford.com, hfdns4.thehartford.com, simns3.thehartford.com, simns3.thehartford.com
> > and simns4.thehartford.com. We?re unsure what?s going on with that.
> 
> Instead of doing 'dig +trace eftc.thehartford.com', do 'dig +trace ns 
> thehartford.com', and you'll see the problem.
> 
> This is a classic authority mismatch, as others have pointed out.
> 
> michael
> 
 		 	   		  

_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users at lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20110615/82ca20bd/attachment.html>


More information about the bind-users mailing list