discrepancy with rndc dumpdb -zones

[Cathy Almond]

Hi Gordon,

We've not seen this before (and it doesn't sound like anyone else has
either).  What version of BIND is it?  Has it reappeared since?  Is this
a particularly heavily loaded/busy server?  Does it have recursive cache
as well as authoritative zones?

Kind regards,

Cathy

Gordon A. Lang wrote:
> After several successful "update delete ..." nsupdate sends to the master
> DNS server, verified with dig, the "rndc dumpdb -zones" command produced
> named_dump.db file still showing the deleted records.  This was repeatable
> and persistent (over the half hour time period) until I performed a hard
> restart of named.
> 
> Has anyone else seen this sort of thing?
> 
> Can anyone explain this?
>