Reverse Configuration

[João Alberto Kuchnier]

Thanks everybody! Everything is fine now! 

My ISP included my reverse in their DNS.

João K.

Em Dom, 2010-10-17 às 10:25 +0100, Matthew Seaman escreveu:
> On 16/10/2010 21:48, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > To be completely clear, unless there is special software on the client
> > to deal with PTRs, you really only want ONE PTR for each address. Most
> > standard network tools tend to assume only one PTR per address and some
> > get very confused when multiple PTRs are returned.
> 
> I'm intrigued as to what software it is that gets confused by having
> multiple PTRs for IPs?  Given I've been running with exactly that
> configuration for many years, and never noticed any problems nor had any
> complaints.
> 
> Still, I hope this whole argument will be rendered moot with the advent
> of IPv6, where addresses are available in such enormous bounty that the
> sensible admin would not only assign an IP per network interface, but
> pretty much an IP per service too.  No more fiddling about with TTLs or
> waiting for changes to propagate should you need to shuffle things
> about, and a natural consequence is that only one PTR would be needed
> per AAAA.
> 
> 	Cheers,
> 
> 	Matthew
> 
> _______________________________________________
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users