Views on differrent interfaces

[Doug Barton]

On 4/22/2010 5:30 AM, Tom Schmitt wrote:
> 
> Thank you for your answer.
> But this doesn't work: With match-destination and match-clients I can only define the same match-clients statement for both destionation interfaces, not differrent one.
> 
> The only workaround I see how to rech my goal by only using these commands is to define a third view which has the exactly same data like the first view. Then I could use machting rules like this:
> view 1 { match-destination { interface1 }; };
> view 2 { match-clients ( trusted_nets }; match-destination { interface2 }; };
> view 3 { match-clients { non-trusted_nets }; match-destination { interface2 }; };
> 
> I hoped there would be a way to do this whith only two views. Like inserting some logic:  matchif( destination=interface1 OR (destination=interface2 AND client=non-trusted_nets) )

Run separate instances of BIND on the two different interfaces.


-- 

	... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
			-- Propellerheads

	Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
	a domain name makeover!    http://SupersetSolutions.com/