CNAME Issue - Whether to use CNAME-data or Response-Flag
Steven Wilmot
steven at data-utilities.co.uk
Sat Apr 10 01:16:53 UTC 2010
-----Original Message-----
From: Doug Barton
>>> I'll leave it up to the protocol experts to answer your question, but my
followup question is:
>> "what bad thing are you seeing happen because of this?"
A very minor side-effect (but one that I would like to understand the cause
of) is that when I try and resolve "mail.wilmot.me.uk" from my own network
(against a local caching-resolver (A Microsoft Win2003 server)) it is coming
bak with an error (when in fact I know that the record should exist)
>> From your original post it seems like some resolvers are not doing what
BIND 9.6.2-P1 is doing,
Precisely ...
In this particular case, the "SOME" includes Microsoft "WIn2003, Win2003 R2,
Win 2008" (but Win2008 R2 seems to be operating correctly forsome reason)..
>> namely chasing the CNAME to come up with an answer to the A query. Is
that your concern?
Yup ...
Regards,
Steven Wilmot
Director
Data Utilities Ltd
More information about the bind-users
mailing list