negative cache TTLs

[Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães]

JINMEI Tatuya / ???? escreveu:
> I strongly recommend you to upgrade to 9.5.1-P1.  9.5.0-P2 has several
> known issues that can lead to SERVFAIL, and it's normally not very
> easy to identify the cause.  If you still see the problem with 9.5.1,
> please report it again.
>
>   
    i have updated to 9.5.1-P1 ..... anyway, the related problem was NOT 
happening frequently. In fact it was the first time my users complained 
about that and i noticed it. Maybe it happened other times, but i didnt 
noticed that.

>>         max-ncache-ttl 30;
>>         max-cache-ttl 7200;
>>     
>
> These are most likely to be irrelevant to your problem.
>
>   

    let's suppose that SERVFAIL wasnt related to some bug and it was, 
indeed, a DNS failure resolution. In that case, of a legitime DNS 
failure resolution, would it be the max-ncache-ttl that would control 
this SERVFAIL time-to-live ?? If not, is there some parameter to control 
these SERVFAIL caches ?


-- 


	Atenciosamente / Sincerily,
	Leonardo Rodrigues
	Solutti Tecnologia
	http://www.solutti.com.br

	Minha armadilha de SPAM, NÃO mandem email
	gertrudes at solutti.com.br
	My SPAMTRAP, do not email it



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20090110/8238b552/attachment.html>