Is 9.5 broken

Rune Rune bamsefrasse at hotmail.com
Fri Sep 26 09:00:55 UTC 2008


Hi, I have compiled and used 9.5 on several Linuxplatforms but we have to restart the bind-process every day since it stop ansver for some domains after some time.
The DNS is recursive and the domain it stop answer for is always .se domains. Is there any DNSSEC issue in 9.5 that is broken maybe? The zones it dont answer for isn't signed by .SE but? When the server stop answer correct it look up other zones correct and after a restart it works ok again.

Regards, Rune
_________________________________________________________________
Var sommaren för kort? Här hittar du solen!
http://resor.se.msn.com/From res at ausics.net  Fri Sep 26 09:52:55 2008
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list bind-users); Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:52:55 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <res at ausics.net>
X-Original-To: bind-users at webster.isc.org
Received: from mx.isc.org (mx.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::1c])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "mx.isc.org", Issuer "ISC CA" (verified OK))
	by webster.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37F6310E478
	for <bind-users at webster.isc.org>; Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:52:55 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from res at ausics.net)
Received: from roswell.ausics.net (valhalla.ausics.net [58.96.38.4])
	by mx.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95FF6114080
	for <bind-users at isc.org>; Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:49:11 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from res at ausics.net)
Received: from roswell.ausics.net (roswell.ausics.net [192.168.0.150])
	by roswell.ausics.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id m8Q9n9JE004765;
	Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:49:09 +1000
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:49:09 +1000 (EST)
From: Res <res at ausics.net>
To: Ulrich David <david.ulrich at siesa.ch>
cc: DNS BIND <bind-users at isc.org>
Subject: Re: Linux kernel and bind9
In-Reply-To: <E6A27CF9-7024-4030-9FE9-A1FC8F206855 at siesa.ch>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0809261948170.4740 at ebfjryy.nhfvpf.arg>
References: <E6A27CF9-7024-4030-9FE9-A1FC8F206855 at siesa.ch>
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	version=3.2.5
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on mx.isc.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: bind-users-bounce at isc.org
Errors-to: bind-users-bounce at isc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:bind-users-request at isc.org?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <bind-users.isc.org>
X-List-ID: <bind-users.isc.org>

On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Ulrich David wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Is there something to tune in the linux kernel in order too have
> better performance on bind9 cache server?
>
> For example on the network part of the kernel?

What bottlenecks are you experiencing?

-- 
Cheers
Res

"The hopes we had, were much to high, way out of reach, but we have to
try, no need to hide, no need to run, cause all the answers come one by
one. The game will never be over, because we're keeping the dream alive"
-Freiheit


More information about the bind-users mailing list