A curious Error

[Ronald Hall]

>	You are/were running an old named with a new rndc.
>
>1480.   [bug]           Provide replay protection for rndc commands.  Full
>                        replay protection requires both rndc and named to
>                        be updated.  Partial replay protection (limited
>                        exposure after restart) is provided if just named
>                        is updated.
>
>	If it continues ensure that you are starting the right instance
>	of named.
>  
>
          Ok I'll buy that, but I only update via rpm from RedHat via 
up2date - how does rndc and named
          get out of date?

          named -v yields   BIND 9.2.4rc


          rndc --version also yields BIND 9.2.4rc6 (after complaining 
that --version is not a valid option :) )

           Just curious

             r