CNAME and other data -vs- could not find NS and/or SOA records
Barry Margolin
barmar at alum.mit.edu
Thu Jun 3 02:46:04 UTC 2004
In article <c9len1$84a$1 at sf1.isc.org>, phil-news-nospam at ipal.net wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Jun 2004 19:10:43 +0100 Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com> wrote:
> |>>>>> "Phil" == phil-news-nospam <phil-news-nospam at ipal.net> writes:
> |
> | Phil> I have a domain (several of them, actually) in which I need
> | Phil> to CNAME them to another domain (which is under someone
> | Phil> else's authority).
> |
> | The DNS does not allow domains to be CNAMEd, to use your terminology.
> | I believe you've been told this already.
>
> But it has been done before. Obviously it was in violation of the RFC,
> but when it was done, it had the desired (and I think quite obvious)
> effect.
Are you sure it actually worked? As the administrator of a slave
server, I've run into many occasions where zone transfers were failing
because the master server had a CNAME record for the zone name.
--
Barry Margolin, barmar at alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
More information about the bind-users
mailing list