Slave servers not auto-updating? (BIND 9.2.1)
Mark Damrose
mdamrose at elgin.cc.il.us
Fri Nov 8 17:14:55 UTC 2002
"Don Werve" <devnull at examen.com> wrote in message
news:slrnasns18.fme.donw at gir.agentsix.net...
> I've got an odd little problem, which is more of an annoyance than a
> mission-critical problem. I've got two slaves sitting off a master
> server (all running the same version of BIND), and when I make an update
> to one of the zonefiles on the Master and 'kill -HUP' it, only one of
> the slaves updates its own cache of the updated zone.
>
> Yes, I'm updating the serial numbers, and all three servers sync off the
> same NTP server. Two are Linux boxen, the third is a Solaris 8 machine,
> but all three are running a hand-compiled copy of BIND (chrooted for
> security).
>
> Nothing odd shows up in the logs on the Solaris machine (the one that
> doesn't update), and if I restart the daemon on that box, it then grabs
> the update without a hitch.
If you let it wait until the REFRESH timer, does it update? Is it listed
with an NS record? If not, do you have an also-notify { ip of Solaris; };
configured?
>
> Any ideas why? I've RTFM and didn't see anything helpful, but I am only
> a mere mortal and might have missed something, so if there are any
> pointers to relevant docs, I'd like them.
>
> Thanks-in-advance!
>
> --
> Don Werve (Unix Sys Admin) | Email: donw AT examen dot com
>
> "Whatever you think you can do or believe you can do, begin it. Action
> has magic, grace and power in it." -- Goethe
More information about the bind-users
mailing list