wrong reverse dns answer, corrupted cache

[Doug Barton]

Mark_Andrews at isc.org wrote:

>         The thing Doug has failed to mention is that he sees this on
>         servers *behind* a forwarder.  There is no "baliwick" when you
>         are behind a forwarder.
> 
>         BIND 8 prior to 8.2.5 would allow records to slip through in the
>         answer it sent on that it didn't cache.
> 
> 1232.   [bug]           don't assume the forwarder has dropped bogus records.
> 
> 1231.   [bug]           always restart a query if we dropped records when
>                         parsing.

	Well I certainly wasn't trying to be deceptive. :) I'm glad to hear
that 8.3 should have this bug fixed. I'll give it a try.

-- 
    "We will not tire, we will not falter, and we will not fail."
	- George W. Bush, President of the United States
          September 20, 2001  

         Do YOU Yahoo!?