DNS Resolving Issue

[aaabyss at a-aabyss.com]

Dustin,

As the others have pointed out no one can help you much without the 
domain name in question.

What is very obvious to me in light of the fact you just changed 
registrars is that one of the 'old' servers is more than likely 
authoritative for the domain in question. You should drop the 'old' 
servers anyway as they will be 'lame' and have incorrect info and  
they will not serve as secondaries to your 'new' servers that have 
the current and correct information for the zone.

Network solutions has nothing to do with the domain anymore as you 
'transferred' registration to UnleadedDNS which now controls the 
'records' for the domain/zone in question. (assuming the UnleadedDNS  
records are correct)

Shot in the dark and educated guess says that will 'fix' your problem.

HTH

On 5 Mar 2001, at 16:35, Dustin wrote:

To:             	comp-protocols-dns-bind at moderators.isc.org
From:           	"Dustin" <dbreese at v-works.com>
Subject:        	DNS Resolving Issue
Date sent:      	Mon, 05 Mar 2001 16:35:53 GMT
Organization:   	Excite at Home - The Leader in Broadband http://home.com/faster

> I am new to this and have done a lot of reading to try and find the answer.
> Maybe you can help me before my hair all falls out (what is left of it)?
> 
> I just switched over a domain name to UnleadedDNS. On my network solutions
> "record" I put UnleadedDNS as the primary and secondary DNS server and moved
> the existing ones to the 3rd and 4th, respectively.
> 
> I have NO control over the 3rd and 4th DNS servers: NS1.4SERVERS.COM and
> NS2.4SERVERS.COM.
> 
> Some of our users were getting the new site on Friday, but are no longer
> getting it today. UnleadedDNS has the latest information.
> 
> I used a pretty nice tool from my machine, DNS Expert, to analyze the
> situation and it also came up with the old IP address. However, when I do a
> PING or TRACERT, it comes up with the NEW IP address.
> 
> 1) Could it be that the old server (NS1.4SERVERS.COM) is pretending to be
> authoratative still?
> 2) Should I not have a 3rd and 4th server?  Are there any drawbacks to doing
> this?
> 
> Thanks!
> Dustin
> 
>