$TTL issue?

Joseph S D Yao jsdy at cospo.osis.gov
Tue Feb 20 17:51:08 UTC 2001


On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 08:53:17AM -0500, Borgia Joe A Contr AFRL/IFOS wrote:
> We had a mail issue over the weekend such that gradually, domains seemed to
> stop resolving
> properly. Domains like aol.com, prodigy.com, earthlink.net...and so on. Many
> of the big name
> domains anyway.
> 
> At the end of last week, we upgraded a couple of our servers to 8.2.3.
> Because the folks
> here are using some automated tools, utilizing Oracle to manage their
> tables, I was not able
> to add the $TTL line to the top of each zone file as it wants. So, BIND told
> me that it was going
> to use the SOA minimum instead.
> 
> That seemed fine to me, since it looks like the SOA minimum is the same as
> what I would have
> set the $TTL to anyway.
> 
> When I got in this morning, I tried a couple of nslookups, and sure enough,
> these domains would
> not resolve. Once I restarted named on each, and did my nslookups again,
> these domains reappeared
> again.
> 
> I was wondering if this $TTL line being missing from zone files could be the
> culprit in this case.

No, but you should put it in.

A random af.mil server tells me that the two name servers for rl.af.mil
are babs.rlcn.rl.af.mil and buster.rl.af.mil.  Neither responds to a
query for name servers for rl.af.mil, or even to resolve their own
names.

I would call this a more serious problem.

Pings to neither system respond, but I would not expect them to for an
af.mil system ...   ;-}

-- 
Joe Yao				jsdy at cospo.osis.gov - Joseph S. D. Yao
COSPO/OSIS Computer Support					EMT-B
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is not an official statement of COSPO policies.


More information about the bind-users mailing list