Bind 9.1.0 does not work properly.
Sung il Kim
clicky at netpia.com
Sat Feb 10 01:23:54 UTC 2001
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Bunclark" <psb at ast.cam.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.dns.bind
To: <comp-protocols-dns-bind at moderators.isc.org>
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 8:49 PM
Subject: Re: Bind 9.1.0 does not work properly.
>
> ±è¼ºÀÏ wrote:
>
> > I tested the bind 9.1.0 on our systems.
> >
> > Our system is Sun Enterprise 450 with 4 Cpu and 2 G memory.
> >
> > The following result are input/output packets.
> >
> > As you can see, though input packets are almost 2500 packets
> >
> > output packets are about 100 packets.
> >
> > But, occasionally dns server replies well.
> >
> > In this time, I tried dig and nslookup to bind9 server and
> >
> > I cannot reply from the server.
> >
> > Bind 9 has a problem that cannot reply with lots of queries?
> >
> > netstat -i 1
> >
> > input hme0 output input (Total) output
> > packets errs packets errs colls packets errs packets errs colls
> >
> > 1073300238 1209 902437472 0 0 1073485138 1209 902622372 0 0
> >
> > 2350 0 93 0 0 2350 0 93 0 0
> >
> > 2419 0 159 0 0 2419 0 159 0 0
> >
> > 2355 0 86 0 0 2355 0 86 0 0
> >
> > 2316 0 108 0 0 2316 0 108 0 0
> >
> > 2458 0 92 0 0 2458 0 92 0 0
> >
> > 2421 0 71 0 0 2421 0 71 0 0
> >
> > 2406 0 59 0 0 2406 0 59 0 0
> >
> > 2433 0 48 0 0 2433 0 48 0 0
> >
> > 2410 0 53 0 0 2410 0 53 0 0
> >
> > 2691 0 74 0 0 2691 0 74 0 0
> >
> > 2327 0 89 0 0 2327 0 89 0 0
> >
> > 2456 0 74 0 0 2456 0 74 0 0
> >
> > 2351 0 41 0 0 2351 0 41 0 0
> >
> > 2406 0 61 0 0 2406 0 61 0 0
> >
> > 2339 0 68 0 0 2339 0 68 0 0
> >
> > 2371 0 93 0 0 2371 0 93 0 0
> >
> > 2349 0 192 0 0 2349 0 192 0 0
> >
> > 3091 0 2077 0 0 3092 0 2078 0 0
> >
> > 2822 0 1733 0 0 2822 0 1733 0 0
> >
> > 2816 0 2111 0 0 2816 0 2111 0 0
> >
> > 2611 0 1745 0 0 2611 0 1745 0 0
> >
> > 2344 0 1291 0 0 2344 0 1291 0 0
> >
> > 2396 0 1278 0 0 2397 0 1279 0 0
> >
> > 2302 0 1346 0 0 2302 0 1346 0 0
> >
> > 2356 0 805 0 0 2356 0 805 0 0
> >
> > 2643 0 1609 0 0 2643 0 1609 0 0
> >
> > 2496 0 1380 0 0 2496 0 1380 0 0
> >
> > 2545 0 1959 0 0 2545 0 1959 0 0
> >
> > 2716 0 2176 0 0 2716 0 2176 0 0
> >
> > 2241 0 1314 0 0 2241 0 1314 0 0
> >
> > 2220 0 1225 0 0 2220 0 1225 0 0
> >
> > 3054 0 1705 0 0 3054 0 1705 0 0
> >
> > 2995 0 2097 0 0 2997 0 2099 0 0
> >
> > 2991 0 1841 0 0 2991 0 1841 0 0
> >
> > 2688 0 1619 0 0 2688 0 1619 0 0
> >
> > 2694 0 1569 0 0 2694 0 1569 0 0
> >
> > 2438 0 911 0 0 2438 0 911 0 0
> >
> > 2337 0 104 0 0 2337 0 104 0 0
> >
> > 2452 0 164 0 0 2452 0 164 0 0
> >
> > 2163 0 103 0 0 2163 0 103 0 0
> >
> > 2482 0 144 0 0 2482 0 144 0 0
> >
> > 2325 0 103 0 0 2325 0 103 0 0
> >
> > 2195 0 121 0 0 2195 0 121 0 0
> >
> > 2261 0 124 0 0 2261 0 124 0 0
> >
> > 2303 0 153 0 0 2303 0 153 0 0
> >
> > 2523 0 98 0 0 2523 0 98 0 0
> >
> > 2593 0 137 0 0 2593 0 137 0 0
> >
> > 2684 0 95 0 0 2684 0 95 0 0
> >
> > 2472 0 91 0 0 2472 0 91 0 0
> >
> > 2478 0 81 0 0 2478 0 81 0 0
> >
> > 2477 0 112 0 0 2477 0 112 0 0
> >
> > 2449 0 85 0 0 2449 0 85 0 0
> >
> > 2481 0 109 0 0 2481 0 109 0 0
> >
> > 2459 0 50 0 0 2459 0 50 0 0
> >
> > 2367 0 71 0 0 2367 0 71 0 0
> >
> > 2640 0 65 0 0 2640 0 65 0 0
> >
> > 2351 0 116 0 0 2351 0 116 0 0
> >
> > 2321 0 61 0 0 2321 0 61 0 0
> >
> > 2319 0 87 0 0 2319 0 87 0 0
> >
> > 2807 0 1496 0 0 2807 0 1496 0 0
> >
> > 3007 0 2214 0 0 3007 0 2214 0 0
> >
> > 2712 0 2203 0 0 2712 0 2203 0 0
> >
> > 2380 0 1897 0 0 2380 0 1897 0 0
> >
> > 2538 0 2335 0 0 2538 0 2335 0 0
> >
> > 2468 0 2171 0 0 2468 0 2171 0 0
> >
> > 2470 0 2485 0 0 2470 0 2485 0 0
> >
> > 2449 0 2183 0 0 2449 0 2183 0 0
> >
> > 2428 0 2275 0 0 2428 0 2275 0 0
> >
> > 2197 0 2146 0 0 2197 0 2146 0 0
> >
> > 2243 0 2181 0 0 2243 0 2181 0 0
>
> Surely this is a network problem? Do other kinds of network
> I/O work well (eg ftp)?
>
> Pete.
>
>
>
More information about the bind-users
mailing list