BIND 9.1.1 responses different from 8.2.3

Mark.Andrews at nominum.com Mark.Andrews at nominum.com
Tue Apr 17 08:46:42 UTC 2001


	The zone is total mess.  You can't expect any server to cope
	with garbage like this.

	Mark

; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> any fmprc.gov.cn @202.99.26.9 
; (1 server found)
;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch
;; got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 6
;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 3, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUERY SECTION:
;;	fmprc.gov.cn, type = ANY, class = IN

;; ANSWER SECTION:
fmprc.gov.cn.		1H IN NS	wjb1.
fmprc.gov.cn.		1H IN SOA	wjb1. . (
					27		; serial
					1H		; refresh
					10M		; retry
					1D		; expiry
					1H )		; minimum

fmprc.gov.cn.		1H IN MX	1 202.99.26.9.

;; Total query time: 857 msec
;; FROM: drugs.dv.isc.org to SERVER: 202.99.26.9
;; WHEN: Tue Apr 17 18:45:14 2001
;; MSG SIZE  sent: 30  rcvd: 110


> It seems that BIND 9.1.1 gives different replies than that of 8.2.3...  I hav
> e 
> a setup which runs both (9.1.1 on Solaris7 SPARC and 8.2.3 on Linux x86) and 
> when our mail server tries to deliver mail to a site (fmprc.gov.cn), it fails
>  
> when the resolver is pointing at the 9.1.1 but goes through when pointed at 
> 8.2.3....
> 
> this is really odd...
> 
> anyone has ideas on what's going on?
> 
> thanks
> 
> 
> rgds,
> 
> - ron 
> 
--
Mark Andrews, Nominum Inc.
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: Mark.Andrews at nominum.com


More information about the bind-users mailing list