Can't communicate with certain nameservers

Kevin Darcy kcd at daimlerchrysler.com
Fri Sep 8 00:09:33 UTC 2000


Yes, most of those appear to be coming from some sort of load balancer,
probably a Distributed Director, judging by the low (in some cases
0) TTL values, and the frequent absence of an Authority or Additional
section to the response. I can't imagine why this would cause a query
timeout, though. Was the sniffer on the same segment as the nameserver, or
on the other side of the router? Were the responses coming back to the
correct port # as well as address (you'd have to scour the debug output to
see what port numbers those should be)?


- Kevin

js wrote:

> There are certain hostnames that my BIND nameserver cannot resolve. It
> seems to be totally unable to communicate with certain other nameservers
> (although 99.8% of them work fine). It just hangs and eventually times
> out. Some that don't work are:
>
> 205.180.59.31   dd1-ca.su-colo.bbnplanet.com  (psw.fidelity.com)
> 207.46.138.6    dd.microsoft.com  (download.microsoft.com)
> 208.158.245.135 ddcw1.barnesandnoble.com  (www.bn.com)
> 141.242.9.50    OCR.FREEDOM.COM  (www.freedom.com)
> 192.193.195.247 md38-01-i-dd1.citicorp.com  (www.accountonline.com)
> 192.151.11.205  paldd1.external.hp.com  (register.hp.com)
>
> With a packet sniffer, I can see a packet returning from the remote
> server, but BIND does not seem to see the packet at all, and doesn't log
> anything even at the highest debug level.
>
> I can't help but notice that most of the hostnames contain "dd". Does
> that suggest they are using Cisco's "DistributedDirector" product?
>
> The router between my nameserver and the internet does not do
> firewalling, but it does do address translation for the nameserver,
> using static NAT. As far as I can tell, that is the only thing even
> slightly unusual about my configuration.
>
> I've tried several versions of BIND (8.x and 4.x) on several different
> Unix and Linux systems, with exactly the same result.
>
> Any idea what is going on here? A nameserver behind NAT does not
> necessarily cause problems, does it? Could my router be mishandling
> something that DistributedDirector depends on? If so, what?






More information about the bind-users mailing list