BIND 8.2.3-T5B and Win2kSP1 DNS: What works and what doesn't?
Shawn Barnhart
swb at cmenoc.campbell-mithun.com
Mon Nov 13 14:24:37 UTC 2000
----- Original Message -----
From: <Mark.Andrews at nominum.com>
> While we want people to test beta software, it is beta
> software. Errors are made occasionally, even in release
> candidates. In BIND 8.2.3's case there has been a T6B (and
> a T7B which was released to smaller group). These are all
> beta releases. T8B will be out sometime soon (don't ask
> when), it won't be a release candidate as some of the fixes
> have much bigger effects that normal. Hopefully T9B will
> be the next release candidate.
So are you telling me that T5B is broken with regard to Win2k interaction?
Is there a version with good basic interaction with Win2k (working notify,
master-slave zone transfers, all the things that appear to be broken with
Win2k now?).
Looking at the CHANGES document in 8.2.3-T6B (which is the most current
version in the FreeBSD source tree), I don't see any particular references
to Win2k problems either existing or being resolved.
I guess I'm kind of stuck with the BIND that comes with FreeBSD. It's
something of a hassle to override "built in" packages on FreeBSD, especially
if you try to track STABLE.
> Our last full releases for BIND 8 is BIND 8.2.2-P7 and was
> made last week.
Maybe it'll get imported into STABLE soon. I can live with the interaction
problems if I know what they are. Right now what's bothering me is I don't
know if they're all my problems or if there are genuine interaction
problems.
More information about the bind-users
mailing list