bind 9 and named-xfer?

Tue Feb 8 18:34:31 UTC 2000

In article <4.3.0.33.0.20000208085102.00cf4a30 at cartman>,
Kevin J. Dunlap <kevind at metaip.checkpoint.com> wrote:
>Do not let the current code for named-xfer live.

What's so bad about it?

-- 
Barry Margolin, barmar at bbnplanet.com
GTE Internetworking, Powered by BBN, Burlington, MA
*** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the group.