nslookup failures

Kevin Darcy kcd at daimlerchrysler.com
Thu Aug 17 22:42:13 UTC 2000


Do you have a zone definition for 105.137.138.in-addr.arpa? If not, then where
did you put the PTR record? If so, then is the zone loading properly? Check
your log files.

I'm not exactly sure what is meant by "address reassignment template"; must be
Navy-speak of some kind. If it's a *delegation* for the entire C-class, then
you need 105.137.138.in-addr.arpa defined on your server. If it's a so-called
"classless delegation", i.e. a bunch of aliases for the addresses in your
sub-class-C range, then you need to look at where those aliases point, and
create the necessary PTR records.


- Kevin

Sears, Robert wrote:

> greetings all-
>
>  here is my question, I operate the primary DNS (nlmoc1.nlmoc.navy.mil)
> server for the domain nlmoc.navy.mil. I also resolve the name nlmof.navy.mil
> at my primary DNS server. We have a group of users out of Florida who used
> to be on a WAN with us and shared our Class C network. This group moved to
> their own Internet connection, with their own IP block, but still point to
> us nlmoc.navy.mil) for DNS resolution. When this group put up two hosts on
> their new network I added then to my DNS tables.
>
> thunder.nlmof.navy.mil    IN  A 138.137.105.10   I also did the PTR record.
> When I do an NSlookup on the name to IP everything resolves. When I IP to
> name lookup I get  nlmoc1.nlmoc.navy.mil can't find 138.137.105.10: Server
> failed. I figured out since I don't own the IP block of 138.137.105.0, that
> this might be the problem. I contacted the navy NIC and they put me in touch
> with the owner of the IP block. The owners then put in an address
> reassignment template basically assigning the 138.137.105.0 block to my DNS
> server nlmoc1.nlmoc.navy.mil. They said this would pass all IP lookup
> request to my DNS server.
>
> I might be missing something, if the requests for IP resolution for the
> 138.137.105.0 blocks are being passed to me, why does my nslookup fail?
>
> any help is greatly appreciated
>
> -rob






More information about the bind-users mailing list