CName Terminology Question
Barry Margolin
barmar at genuity.net
Thu Apr 13 23:57:22 UTC 2000
In article <38F65908.B5E35509 at tmca.com.au>,
Stanley Liu <stanley.liu at tmca.com.au> wrote:
>So what is the difference between the following set up:
>
>bar.com. IN A 192.168.1.1
>foo.bar.com. IN A 192.168.1.1
>
>as compared to
>
>bar.com. IN A 192.168.1.1
>foo.bar.com. IN CNAME bar.com.
>
>What if I query about foo.bar.com, is there any difference in the answer? Under
No.
>what circumstances would I use the former and and under what
>circumstances would I
>use the latter?
You would use two A records if you needed to have NS or MX records pointing
to foo.bar.com, since they're not supposed to point to CNAME records.
I recommend using CNAMEs whenever it doesn't conflict with a restriction
against using CNAMEs, so that you don't have to have redundant entries.
The restrictions are that a name with a CNAME record can't have any other
records (this is why an SOA can't be a CNAME as well) and recorders that
point to other names can't point to CNAME records.
--
Barry Margolin, barmar at genuity.net
Genuity, Burlington, MA
*** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the group.
More information about the bind-users
mailing list