choosing a root server(s)
Cricket Liu
cricket at acmebw.com
Mon Jul 5 22:12:38 UTC 1999
AndrX Pirard <A.Pirard at ulg.ac.be> wrote in message
news:37820fa0.56999268 at nntp.ulg.ac.be...
> According to what you say, it seems a valid method, to avoid tedious
> maintenance of departmental servers under foreign administration, to
> configure these servers once with root hints to central servers having
> the list of root servers in cache, for example:
>
> . 99999999 IN NS ns1.my.domain.
> ns1.my.domain. 99999999 IN A 1.2.3.4
> . 99999999 IN NS ns2.my.domain.
> ns2.my.domain. 99999999 IN A 1.2.4.5
>
> Correct?
That's ugly, but I guess it would work. Some BIND name servers will use the
root hints if they don't get a response to their system query, which would
have unintended results in your setup.
> I would like however to have a garantee that this method passes an
> upgrade to BIND 8 and to have the following behavior explained.
Hey, I'm not in the business of giving people free guarantees. :-)
> If I query such a dpt BIND server with '. any', I may get an answer
> listing nsX.my.domain as roots, alone or with other real root servers.
> This answer lasts just for one query. The next query answers the
> correct list of real root servers alone with fresh TTLs.
> So, it seems that the root cache is refreshed on demand and a
> posteriori (those departmental servers are also forwarders, so that
> they rarely use their root cache, which makes the phenomenon visible).
> Is the root cache also initialized on demand (rather than when the
> server starts in a strict sense)?
Yes, in BIND 8 it is.
cricket
Acme Byte & Wire
cricket at acmebw.com
www.acmebw.com
Attend our next DNS and BIND class! See
www.acmebw.com/training.htm for the
schedule and to register for upcoming
classes.
More information about the bind-users
mailing list