large size binaries after compile on Solaris2.6?

[ashley]

thanks, as you can tell I'm pretty new at this stuff.
the file  sample file sizes are now:

-rwxr-xr-x   1 root     staff     662088 Dec  7 23:54 named*
-rwxr-xr-x   1 root     staff     357088 Dec  7 23:54 named-xfer*
-rwxr-xr-x   1 root     staff      51264 Dec  7 23:54 ndc*

ashley

----- Original Message -----
From: <Mark_Andrews at iengines.com>
To: ashley <ashley at ims.telstra.com.au>
Cc: <bind-users at isc.org>
Sent: Monday, December 06, 1999 7:33 PM
Subject: Re: large size binaries after compile on Solaris2.6?


>
> > The only debug I use is on nsupdate and this still works on the rh6.0
> > machine.  How would I go about "stripping" them down as I have a real
space
> > problem at this moment?
> >
> > ashley
>
> strip
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <Mark.Andrews at iengines.com>
> > To: ashley <ashley at ims.telstra.com.au>
> > Cc: <bind-users at isc.org>
> > Sent: Monday, December 06, 1999 12:32 PM
> > Subject: Re: large size binaries after compile on Solaris2.6?
> >
> >
> > >
> > > If you were to strip the binaries you would find that they
> > > are of a comparible size.  However stripped binaries are much
> > > harder to debug if you have problems.
> > >
> > > Mark
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > > I just complied and configured bind8.2.2p5 in what I thought to be
> > > > successfully on a solaris 2.6 sun box.  But after completing my
testing
> > I
> > > > noticed a fair bit of disk space had been chewed up.  Initial
comparison
> > > > between file sizes on my Sun box to those on a test RH6.0 box showed
> > those
> > > > on the sun box to be a fair bit larger eg:
> > > >
> > > > sun:
> > > > -rwxr-xr-x   1 root     staff    7145336 Nov  1 05:06 named
> > > > -rwxr-xr-x   1 root     staff       6463 Nov  1 05:06 named-bootconf
> > > > -rwxr-xr-x   1 root     staff    5049996 Nov  1 05:06 named-xfer
> > > > -rwxr-xr-x   1 root     staff     447452 Nov  1 05:06 ndc
> > > >
> > > > rh6.0:
> > > > -rwxr-xr-x   1 root     root       531728 Mar 31  1999 named
> > > > -rwxr-xr-x   1 root     root         6463 Jun 21 15:25
named-bootconf
> > > > -rwxr-xr-x   1 root     root       280928 Mar 31  1999 named-xfer
> > > > -rwsr-xr-x   1 root     root        38368 Mar 31  1999 ndc
> > > >
> > > > Note: the binaries on the rh6.0 box are those that came with the
dist.
> > and
> > > > don't support named -version but show as 8.2 in the log file
> > > >
> > > > When compiling I just followed the instructions
> > > >
> > > > make stdlinks
> > > > make clean
> > > > make depend
> > > > make all
> > > > make install
> > > >
> > > > and didn't change anything in port/solaris
> > > >
> > > > Is this large file size normal or should I have compiled it in a
> > different
> > > > manner?
> > > >
> > > > regards
> > > >
> > > > ashley martin
> > > >
> > > >
> > > --
> > > Mark Andrews, Internet Engines Inc. / Internet Software Consortium
> > > 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> > > PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET:
Mark_Andrews at iengines.com
> > >
> >
> >
> --
> Mark Andrews, Internet Engines Inc. / Internet Software Consortium
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews at iengines.com
>