large size binaries after compile on Solaris2.6?
Mark.Andrews at iengines.com
Mark.Andrews at iengines.com
Mon Dec 6 11:33:02 UTC 1999
> The only debug I use is on nsupdate and this still works on the rh6.0
> machine. How would I go about "stripping" them down as I have a real space
> problem at this moment?
>
> ashley
strip
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Mark.Andrews at iengines.com>
> To: ashley <ashley at ims.telstra.com.au>
> Cc: <bind-users at isc.org>
> Sent: Monday, December 06, 1999 12:32 PM
> Subject: Re: large size binaries after compile on Solaris2.6?
>
>
> >
> > If you were to strip the binaries you would find that they
> > are of a comparible size. However stripped binaries are much
> > harder to debug if you have problems.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > > I just complied and configured bind8.2.2p5 in what I thought to be
> > > successfully on a solaris 2.6 sun box. But after completing my testing
> I
> > > noticed a fair bit of disk space had been chewed up. Initial comparison
> > > between file sizes on my Sun box to those on a test RH6.0 box showed
> those
> > > on the sun box to be a fair bit larger eg:
> > >
> > > sun:
> > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root staff 7145336 Nov 1 05:06 named
> > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root staff 6463 Nov 1 05:06 named-bootconf
> > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root staff 5049996 Nov 1 05:06 named-xfer
> > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root staff 447452 Nov 1 05:06 ndc
> > >
> > > rh6.0:
> > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 531728 Mar 31 1999 named
> > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 6463 Jun 21 15:25 named-bootconf
> > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 280928 Mar 31 1999 named-xfer
> > > -rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 38368 Mar 31 1999 ndc
> > >
> > > Note: the binaries on the rh6.0 box are those that came with the dist.
> and
> > > don't support named -version but show as 8.2 in the log file
> > >
> > > When compiling I just followed the instructions
> > >
> > > make stdlinks
> > > make clean
> > > make depend
> > > make all
> > > make install
> > >
> > > and didn't change anything in port/solaris
> > >
> > > Is this large file size normal or should I have compiled it in a
> different
> > > manner?
> > >
> > > regards
> > >
> > > ashley martin
> > >
> > >
> > --
> > Mark Andrews, Internet Engines Inc. / Internet Software Consortium
> > 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> > PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews at iengines.com
> >
>
>
--
Mark Andrews, Internet Engines Inc. / Internet Software Consortium
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews at iengines.com
More information about the bind-users
mailing list