Recommendation for redundancy

[Pereida, Alejandro]

We would like redundancy to support the existing addresses (about 80
address pools), yes both the active Datacenter and DR center are
permanently tied
Together via a redundant 10Gb fiber link

On 3/6/18, 5:13 AM, "dhcp-users on behalf of Simon Hobson"
<dhcp-users-bounces at lists.isc.org on behalf of dhcp1 at thehobsons.co.uk>
wrote:

>"Pereida, Alejandro" <APereida at IID.com> wrote:
>
>> We have been using a single Linux server as our DHCP server running ISC
>>DHCP Server 4.3.1
>> We are building a ³secondary datacenter² for disaster recovery
>>purposes. What is the most recommended
>> Option for implementing a redundant DHCP server scenario in case the
>>main datacenter (where the DHCP server resides)
>> goes dark?
>
>You need to expand a bit - is this to support the existing addresses, or
>another range, or something else ? And are the sites permanently
>networked together ?
>
>In principle, all you need to do is add another server in a failover pair
>- and then both servers will support the same address range(s). Given the
>additional hop, it's likely that the on-site server will handle requests
>most of the time as it'll get a reply back to the clients first.
>
>_______________________________________________
>dhcp-users mailing list
>dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
>https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users