Help with DHCPv6 client-identifiers

[Ted Lemon]

On Nov 19, 2011, at 3:34 AM, "Alex Bligh" <alex at alex.org.uk> wrote:
> So, as I said, we use auto configure, which works just fine and has 100%
> support in IPv6 compliant client OSes (unlike at the time dhcpv6). If
> dhcpdv6 had been less of a use-case-hostile design, I think it would have
> far wider deployment.

I have trouble understanding why this is a bad outcome, and what all the vitriol is about.   If RA is working fine for you, why do you care that DHCPv6 is not?