DHCPv6 failover protocol?

Fri Mar 6 02:02:58 UTC 2009

On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 06:30:01PM -0700, Ted Lemon wrote:
> You mean DHCPv6 load balancing?   Yes, that seems more likely.   Because 

No.  I'm not even sure an explicit protocol or algorithm for load
balancing is necessary (just have the servers emit different priotiy
options, no magic).  I think load balancing is a bit more likely to be
needed than failover tho, I'll give you that.

-- 
David W. Hankins	"If you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineer		     you'll just have to do it again."
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.		-- Jack T. Hankins
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/attachments/20090305/07fb73b5/attachment.bin>