Abandoned messages.
Keith
kwoody at citytel.net
Tue Jan 8 19:17:48 UTC 2008
Ive got three clients that are doing this:
Jan 8 11:03:35 netreg1 dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 00:11:43:41:84:2c via
69.176.166.1
Jan 8 11:03:35 netreg1 dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on 69.176.166.126 to
00:11:43:41:84:2c (Bekah) via 69.176.166.1
Jan 8 11:03:35 netreg1 dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 69.176.166.126
(209.145.111.37) from 00:11:43:41:84:2c (Bekah) via 69.176.166.1
Jan 8 11:03:35 netreg1 dhcpd: DHCPACK on 69.176.166.126 to
00:11:43:41:84:2c (Bekah) via 69.176.166.1
Jan 8 11:03:35 netreg1 dhcpd: Abandoning IP address 69.176.166.126:
declined.
Why would a client go through the whole discover/offer/request/ack then
the server at the end of it say declined, when the client ACK'd the
request?
lease 69.176.166.126 {
starts 2 2008/01/08 18:09:45;
ends 2 2008/01/08 18:09:46;
binding state free;
hardware ethernet 00:e0:18:57:f7:d4;
uid "\001\000\340\030W\367\324";
--
lease 69.176.166.126 {
starts 2 2008/01/08 18:09:46;
ends 2 2008/01/15 18:09:46;
binding state active;
next binding state free;
hardware ethernet 00:e0:18:57:f7:d4;
--
lease 69.176.166.126 {
starts 2 2008/01/08 18:09:46;
ends 2 2008/01/08 18:09:46;
tstp 2 2008/01/08 18:09:46;
binding state abandoned;
next binding state free;
--
And in dhcpd.leases I have that IP address in three different
states...active, free and abandoned.
Then in a blink as I'm grepping over the dhcpd.leases file, 69.176.166.126
is not in there as dhcpd seems to have rewritten the lease file.
Its only 3 clients that are doing this on this one subnet and seems kind
of a tricky situation.
Any pointers on what happening here?
Thanks,
Keith
More information about the dhcp-users
mailing list