vista, dns woes ?

[Simon Hobson]

James Clark Calloway wrote:
>It was a global option.
>
>We relied on the unknown classification to get
>the dns server defined for the unknown pool.
>
>In that same subnet we have some known devices
>that get the "good" dns servers. It's only if you
>are unknown that you get into the dynamic pool
>and thats where the "bad" dns servers are defined.

I suspect that may be the problem - the DHCP server not looking at 
the known/unknown pool options and so the clients get either the 
subnet or globally defined option.

I suspect that if you configure the walled garden dns servers as the 
subnet option then you'll see clients in the known pool getting bad 
dns servers in response to dhcp informs. Might be worth a try and see 
what happens.